![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:15 • Filed to: Ford, Diesel | ![]() | ![]() |
Y HALO THAR.
Today in “Stuff that I saw on
Autoblog
”:
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
at the JLR-sourced 3.0L V6 diesel that’s going into the F-150.
The engine.
Capless DIESEL Fuel Filler.
FYI.
A Jaaaaag, kind of.
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:35 |
|
2.7l, 3.0l, 3.5l,6.2l. Lots of options.
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:35 |
|
That guy in the engine bay is thicc.
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:37 |
|
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:45 |
|
Is that bigfoot climbing into the engine?
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:46 |
|
Is that the Diesel ghost climbing into the engine?
![]() 09/15/2016 at 19:54 |
|
If I can ever afford a new truck I may consider this thing
![]() 09/15/2016 at 20:08 |
|
I like the Ferd wth the different bed and tailgate option
![]() 09/15/2016 at 20:16 |
|
The booty tho.
![]() 09/16/2016 at 07:03 |
|
DAMMIT GM WHERE’S MY 4.5 DURAMAX ALREADY
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:19 |
|
Why introduce a diesel? Doesn’t that compete with the Ecoboost?
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:24 |
|
You don’t want smokey apparitions emanating from your jaguar engine.
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:26 |
|
When did logic interfere with the desire a diesel pick up?
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:28 |
|
Because RAM has a diesel option as well, and Ford does not.
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:28 |
|
Because fuel mileage and torque. More specifically, fuel mileage while towing.
![]() 09/16/2016 at 11:40 |
|
good shit go sHit thats some goodshit rightthere rightthere if i do a so my self i say so thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ) mMMMM O0OOOOOOooo Good shit
![]() 09/16/2016 at 12:22 |
|
EcoBoost has efficiency problems under high load (read: towing), a diesel doesn’t.
That’s not to say that either one is a sustainable option (both have major emissions problems), but for that particular workload, with the technology that Ford has access to right now, diesel’s probably the better choice.